A continuación, os dejo una lista que trataré de ir actualizando con aquellos artículos que, sobre el tema de la investigación cualitativa, me han parecido especialmente interesantes, útiles, reveladores, … En definitiva, aquellos que más me gustan y que considero básicos.

• Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2019). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1704846
• Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012). APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
• Ceglowski, D., Bacigalupa, C. & Peck, E. (2011). Aced Out: Censorship of Qualitative Research in the Age of “Scientifically Based Research.” Qualitative Inquiry, 17(8), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411415497 
• Denzin, N. K. (2016). Critical Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416681864 
• Denzin, N. K. (2013). “The Death of Data?” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487882
• Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186 
• Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098034 
• Denzin, N. K. (2010). ‘On Elephants and gold standards.’ Qualitative Research, 10(2), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109357367 
• Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, Mixed Methods, and Paradigm Dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364608 
• Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the Coding Process in Qualitative Data Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560  
• Fielding, N. G. (2018). New Data and Old Dilemmas: Changes and Continuities in Online Social Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809130 
• Flick, U. (2018). The Concepts of Qualitative Data: Challenges in Neoliberal Times for Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809132 
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363  Version español: Flyvbjerg, B. & CASADO, M. T. (2004). Cinco malentendidos acerca de la investigación mediante los estudios de caso. Reis, 106, 33. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184584 
• Gage, N. (1989). The Paradigm Wars and Their Aftermath: A “Historical” Sketch of Research on Teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177163 
• Gioia, D., Corley, K., Eisenhardt, K., Feldman, M., Langley, A., Lê, J., Golden-Biddle, K., Locke, K., Mees-Buss, J., Piekkari, R., Ravasi, D., Rerup, C., Schmid, T., Silverman, D., & Welch, C. (2022). A Curated Debate: On Using “Templates” in Qualitative Research. Journal of Management Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926221098955 
• Given, L. M. (2017). It’s a New Year…So Let’s Stop the Paradigm Wars. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691769264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917692647
• Korstjens, I. & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092 
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444 
• Maxwell, J. A. (2020). Why qualitative methods are necessary for generalization. Qualitative Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000173 
• Maxwell, J. A. (2019). The Value of Qualitative Inquiry for Public Policy. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419857093 
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). The Importance of Qualitative Research for Causal Explanation in Education. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(8), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412452856 
• Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using Numbers in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364740 
• Maxwell, J. (2019). Evidence for What? How Mixed Methods Expands the Evidence for Causation in Educational Research. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research (AERA). https://doi.org/10.3102/1440524 
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121 Versión Español: Tracy, S. (2021). Calidad cualitativa: ocho pilares para una investigación cualitativa de calidad. Márgenes Revista De Educación De La Universidad De Málaga, 2(2), 173-201. https://doi.org/10.24310/mgnmar.v2i2.12937